<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Waking Badger &#187; rumor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wakingbadger.com/tag/rumor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wakingbadger.com</link>
	<description>Topic by topic, you never know what will wake the Badger…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 19:25:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rumor: Palm Pre severely constrained on launch?</title>
		<link>http://wakingbadger.com/2009/05/21/rumor-palm-pre-severely-constrained-on-launch/</link>
		<comments>http://wakingbadger.com/2009/05/21/rumor-palm-pre-severely-constrained-on-launch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 22:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingbadger.com/?p=1434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Best Buy stores only getting 4 Palm Pres for launch day? : Boy Genius Report. Wow, if this rumor is true (which I somewhat doubt, but given Sprint/Palm&#8217;s track record is plausible) then the Pre is going to have one &#8230; <a href="http://wakingbadger.com/2009/05/21/rumor-palm-pre-severely-constrained-on-launch/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://wakingbadger.com/fileShare/imageShare/tech/palm_pre.jpg" alt="Palm Pre" width="140" height="227" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/05/21/best-buy-stores-only-getting-4-palm-pres-for-launch-day/"> Best Buy stores only getting 4 Palm Pres for launch day?  : Boy Genius Report</a>.</p>
<p>Wow, if this rumor is true (which I somewhat doubt, but given Sprint/Palm&#8217;s track record is plausible) then the Pre is going to have one tough road. 4 per Best Buy, 2 per RadioShack? I&#8217;ve read the other rumors about supply issues, but are they real or is Palm/Sprint playing the Nintendo game of limiting supply to build demand?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think either company is in any position to risk this release, so for their sake I hope this isn&#8217;t true. They will already probably only have 2 days before being washed out in the Apple news tsunami that will likely be WWDC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wakingbadger.com/2009/05/21/rumor-palm-pre-severely-constrained-on-launch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fan Four rebooting?</title>
		<link>http://wakingbadger.com/2009/03/09/fan-four-rebooting/</link>
		<comments>http://wakingbadger.com/2009/03/09/fan-four-rebooting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 03:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comicbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingbadger.com/?p=1327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting&#8230;it looks like the Fantastic Four franchise may be up for a reboot. The previous two films were both profitable, but ultimately, the word of mouth was fairly lousy. I think I am one of the few comic book fans &#8230; <a href="http://wakingbadger.com/2009/03/09/fan-four-rebooting/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230;it looks like the Fantastic Four franchise may be up for a <a href="http://www.iesb.net/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=6457&amp;Itemid=99">reboot</a>. The previous two films were both profitable, but ultimately, the word of mouth was fairly lousy. I think I am one of the few comic book fans that gave them a pass. Honestly, I could look past the warts and enjoy them as simple action/comedy fair and also simply enjoy seem these icons brought to the screen. All that said, with comic book adaptations taking on more serious/skilled attempts, this is likely a VERY good idea. I don&#8217;t think a third outing for this formula would fair well in the current movie ecosystem&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wakingbadger.com/2009/03/09/fan-four-rebooting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hex, GL, &amp; Fury, but NO mother$@&amp;#! snakes</title>
		<link>http://wakingbadger.com/2009/02/25/hex-gl-and-nick-fury-but-no-mother-snakes/</link>
		<comments>http://wakingbadger.com/2009/02/25/hex-gl-and-nick-fury-but-no-mother-snakes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comicbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingbadger.com/?p=1309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just thought I would pass along some comic book movie rumors/news that I&#8217;ve seen in the past day or so&#8230; We&#8217;re getting Jonah Hex on August 6, 2010 &#38; Green Lantern on December 17, 2010 Samuel L. Jackson to &#8230; <a href="http://wakingbadger.com/2009/02/25/hex-gl-and-nick-fury-but-no-mother-snakes/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 290px"><img src="http://wakingbadger.com/fileShare/imageShare/comicbooks/greenlantern_nofear.jpg" alt="Green Lantern: No Fear - cover by Alex Ross" width="280" height="420" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Green Lantern: No Fear - cover by Alex Ross</p></div>
<p>I just thought I would pass along some comic book movie rumors/news that I&#8217;ve seen in the past day or so&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>We&#8217;re getting <a href="http://www.aintitcool.com/node/40233">Jonah Hex on August 6, 2010</a> &amp; <a href="http://www.aintitcool.com/node/40233">Green Lantern on December 17, 2010</a></li>
<li>Samuel L. Jackson to <a href="http://www.iesb.net/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=6376&amp;Itemid=99">reprise his role as Nick Fury</a> NINE times!</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;ve never followed Jonah Hex that carefully, but I think the caustic western character from the comic could do well on the big screen (not that he would be the first of the type in the genre <img src='http://wakingbadger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ). It looks like they&#8217;ve got <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000982/">Josh Brolin</a> playing Hex and I think he could carry the role quite well. Green Lantern just floors me! This could be amazing or it could suck. I assuming this would be an origin story? There&#8217;s SO MUCH history to Green Lantern, but how will they handle it all?</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Which Green Lantern?</strong> Alan Scott (not likely), Hal Jordan, Guy Gardner, John Stewart, or Kyle Rayner?</li>
<li><strong>How will they handle the special effects of the power ring? Will it be the original magical or the technological ring?<br />
</strong></li>
<li><strong>Will the Green Lantern Corp. be featured?</strong></li>
<li><strong>Will the Guardians play a role?</strong></li>
<li><strong>Will Sinestro be the villain?</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>Ah&#8230;possibly a whole year and a half or so to consider, debate, and follow the developments just like the fan boy I am <img src='http://wakingbadger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wakingbadger.com/2009/02/25/hex-gl-and-nick-fury-but-no-mother-snakes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pixar Blu-rays coming May 19th?</title>
		<link>http://wakingbadger.com/2009/02/22/pixar-blu-rays-coming-may-19th/</link>
		<comments>http://wakingbadger.com/2009/02/22/pixar-blu-rays-coming-may-19th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingbadger.com/?p=1301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the Pixar Blog and TheHDRoom, we&#8217;ll be seeing Monsters, Inc. and A Bug&#8217;s Life on Blu-ray on May 19th in advance of the theatrical release of Up. The cover mock-ups aren&#8217;t final yet, but the price seems a &#8230; <a href="http://wakingbadger.com/2009/02/22/pixar-blu-rays-coming-may-19th/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://wakingbadger.com/fileShare/imageShare/movies/2009_pixar_blu-ray.jpg" alt="Blu-ray covers for Monster's Inc. and A Bug's Life" width="350" height="227" />According to the <a href="http://pixarblog.blogspot.com/2009/02/bugs-and-monsters-blu-ray-details.html">Pixar Blog</a> and <a href="http://www.thehdroom.com/news/First_Monsters_Inc._and_A_Bugs_Life_Blu-ray_Details/4305">TheHDRoom</a>, we&#8217;ll be seeing <em>Monsters, Inc.</em> and <em>A Bug&#8217;s Life</em> on Blu-ray on May 19th in advance of the theatrical release of <em>Up</em>. The cover mock-ups aren&#8217;t final yet, but the price seems a bit high to me. ~$40 is just asking a bit much for Blu-ray, but maybe not as I KNOW I will be buying them. Pixar movies just don&#8217;t seem to have an upper end for me, so maybe Disney/Pixar has targeted the perfect price?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wakingbadger.com/2009/02/22/pixar-blu-rays-coming-may-19th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Possible new features coming in iPhone OS 2.2</title>
		<link>http://wakingbadger.com/2008/10/25/possible-new-features-coming-in-iphone-os-22/</link>
		<comments>http://wakingbadger.com/2008/10/25/possible-new-features-coming-in-iphone-os-22/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPod & iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingbadger.wordpress.com/?p=999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Beta 2 of iPhone OS 2.2, developers are finding that the following cool features are present, but may or may not see the light of day with this release: Google Street View E-mailing of current location Downloading of Podcasts &#8230; <a href="http://wakingbadger.com/2008/10/25/possible-new-features-coming-in-iphone-os-22/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Beta 2 of iPhone OS 2.2, developers are <a href="http://www.appleiphoneapps.com/2008/10/more-gems-found-in-os-22-beta-2/">finding</a> that the following cool features are present, but may or may not see the light of day with this release:</p>
<ul>
<li>Google Street View</li>
<li>E-mailing of current location</li>
<li>Downloading of Podcasts</li>
</ul>
<p>The last one is what caught my eye the most. I would LOVE to be able to download my podcasts directly on the iPhone as I would have much less reason to ever dock as I already get mail, calendar, contact changes via IMAP or push (well, push-y sync).</p>
<p>This would be a great feature and I hope they ship 2.2 with all of this enabled soon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wakingbadger.com/2008/10/25/possible-new-features-coming-in-iphone-os-22/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T to Remain Sole US iPhone Carrier into 2010?</title>
		<link>http://wakingbadger.com/2008/08/02/att-to-remain-sole-us-iphone-carrier-into-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://wakingbadger.com/2008/08/02/att-to-remain-sole-us-iphone-carrier-into-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 01:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPod & iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingbadger.wordpress.com/?p=814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&#38;T to Remain Sole US iPhone Carrier into 2010? &#8211; Mac Rumors It looks like AT&#38;T &#38; Apple negotiated an extension of their exclusivity agreement in the US around the launch of the iPhone 3G. I&#8217;m not sure whether this &#8230; <a href="http://wakingbadger.com/2008/08/02/att-to-remain-sole-us-iphone-carrier-into-2010/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://wakingbadger.com/fileShare/imageShare/miscellaneous/att-logo.jpg" alt="AT&amp;T Logo" width="300" height="300" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/08/01/atandt-to-remain-sole-us-iphone-carrier-into-2010/">AT&amp;T to Remain Sole US iPhone Carrier into 2010? &#8211; Mac Rumors</a></p>
<p>It looks like AT&amp;T &amp; Apple negotiated an extension of their exclusivity agreement in the US around the launch of the iPhone 3G. I&#8217;m not sure whether this is good news or not for anyone or not. I really can&#8217;t think of a US carrier that would treat us better as they all seem to be foul in their own special way. Verizon, Sprint, and Alltel (the first two of which I have tried) are based on CDMA which I dislike as it is US only. No one else is using it. However, as they switch to LTE in the future, maybe the value proposition will be better. T-Mobile is a non-starter as they don&#8217;t support much at all of NC and if anyone has a smaller 3G footprint than AT&amp;T, it is T-Mobile. AT&amp;T is the one GSM carrier left standing.</p>
<p>Now, if only they would learn to treat their paying customers better&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wakingbadger.com/2008/08/02/att-to-remain-sole-us-iphone-carrier-into-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone 3G firmware may still have some tricks left</title>
		<link>http://wakingbadger.com/2008/06/20/iphone-3g-firmware-may-still-have-some-tricks-left/</link>
		<comments>http://wakingbadger.com/2008/06/20/iphone-3g-firmware-may-still-have-some-tricks-left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPod & iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingbadger.wordpress.com/?p=754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iPhone 3G firmware has FM radio support, FOTA &#8211; iPhone Atlas   Interesting rumor. I&#8217;m not sure I care that much about either (I&#8217;d much rather the iPhone work with my Nike+), but I imagine there are some people who &#8230; <a href="http://wakingbadger.com/2008/06/20/iphone-3g-firmware-may-still-have-some-tricks-left/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" style="float:right" src="http://wakingbadger.com/fileShare/imageShare/miscellaneous/icon_apple-iphone.jpg" alt="Apple iPhone" width="100" height="189" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.iphoneatlas.com/2008/06/19/iphone-3g-firmware-has-fm-radio-support-fota/">iPhone 3G firmware has FM radio support, FOTA  &#8211; iPhone Atlas</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Interesting rumor. I&#8217;m not sure I care that much about either (I&#8217;d much rather the iPhone work with my Nike+), but I imagine there are some people who would be thrilled by the FM support. OTA firmware updates could be useful, but I don&#8217;t mind connecting my iPhone daily to keep it charged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wakingbadger.com/2008/06/20/iphone-3g-firmware-may-still-have-some-tricks-left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone Sensors = more natural use of iPhone?</title>
		<link>http://wakingbadger.com/2008/06/19/iphone-sensors-more-natural-use-of-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://wakingbadger.com/2008/06/19/iphone-sensors-more-natural-use-of-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPod & iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingbadger.wordpress.com/?p=753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iPhone Sensors and iChat VOIP Integration? &#8211; Mac Rumors Interesting patent application that shows that Apple is looking for new ways to make the iPhone experience more natural based on actions, location of the phone, etc. I especially like the &#8230; <a href="http://wakingbadger.com/2008/06/19/iphone-sensors-more-natural-use-of-iphone/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/06/19/iphone-sensors-and-ichat-voip-integration/">iPhone Sensors and iChat VOIP Integration? &#8211; Mac Rumors</a></p>
<p>Interesting patent application that shows that Apple is looking for new ways to make the iPhone experience more natural based on actions, location of the phone, etc. I especially like the idea of transferring calls when docked to a VOIP-based iChat. I doubt we will see any of this in iPhone firmware 2.0. This is likely forward thinking for later this year or next (if at all).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wakingbadger.com/2008/06/19/iphone-sensors-more-natural-use-of-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A new iSight from Apple?</title>
		<link>http://wakingbadger.com/2008/06/15/a-new-isight-from-apple/</link>
		<comments>http://wakingbadger.com/2008/06/15/a-new-isight-from-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 01:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingbadger.wordpress.com/?p=739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple to Release an &#8216;iSight HD&#8217;? &#8211; Mac Rumors Could we be getting a new iSight? The original Firewire-based model was quite good. I now have an iSight in my MacBook, but the thought of a true HD version of &#8230; <a href="http://wakingbadger.com/2008/06/15/a-new-isight-from-apple/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/06/15/apple-to-release-an-isight-hd/">Apple to Release an &#8216;iSight HD&#8217;? &#8211; Mac Rumors</a></p>
<p>Could we be getting a new iSight? The original Firewire-based model was quite good. I now have an iSight in my MacBook, but the thought of a true HD version of the iSight sounds quite intruiging&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wakingbadger.com/2008/06/15/a-new-isight-from-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More iPhone 3G details: tethering &amp; upgrades</title>
		<link>http://wakingbadger.com/2008/06/15/more-iphone-3g-details-tethering-upgrades/</link>
		<comments>http://wakingbadger.com/2008/06/15/more-iphone-3g-details-tethering-upgrades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 01:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPod & iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakingbadger.wordpress.com/?p=738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More iPhone 3G tidbits trickling in: No Tethering, Upgrading Policy, 2nd Proximity Sensor &#38; more &#8211; iPhone Hacks It looks as if tethering will continue to be unsupported. My belief is that this is entirely AT&#38;T&#8217;s doing. Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t &#8230; <a href="http://wakingbadger.com/2008/06/15/more-iphone-3g-details-tethering-upgrades/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.iphonehacks.com/2008/06/iphone3gdetails.html">More iPhone 3G tidbits trickling in: No Tethering, Upgrading Policy, 2nd Proximity Sensor &amp; more &#8211; iPhone Hacks</a></p>
<p>It looks as if tethering will continue to be unsupported. My belief is that this is entirely AT&amp;T&#8217;s doing. Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t believe this is likely to change in the near future. Now, on to some good news. It seems that upgrades should go smoothly and that the new 2 year contract will simply replace your old contract rather than add to it. I don&#8217;t know if this is specific to current iPhone owners or if it is true for all AT&amp;T customers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wakingbadger.com/2008/06/15/more-iphone-3g-details-tethering-upgrades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
